Buterin questions whether post-quantum cryptography is sufficient
A Reddit post reports that Vitalik Buterin now questions whether even post-quantum cryptography could be at risk, while noting some form of it will be needed. The poster argues for moving off ECDSA/RSA and building crypto agility.
Why “Rumor”
- Only community or trader posts: r/CryptoCurrency
0 independent source groups across 1 post · evidence score 9/100. How labels work
What the sources claim
-
Vitalik Buterin is questioning whether even post-quantum cryptography could be at risk.
“Now he's questioning if even post quantum cryptography could be at risk”
r/CryptoCurrency -
Buterin said public-key encryption is a harder challenge because it needs mathematical structure beyond hashes alone.
“public-key encryption presents a harder challenge because it needs mathematical structure beyond hashes alone”
r/CryptoCurrency -
Buterin noted that some form of post-quantum cryptography will be needed.
“he notes we will need some form of post quantum cryptography”
r/CryptoCurrency -
The poster argues a solution is needed to move off ECDSA/RSA immediately because they were already at risk.
“you need a solution to get off ecdsa / rsa yesterday because these were already at risk”
r/CryptoCurrency
Sources
More in Protocols & Tech
Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-10-08 14:10 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.