Fake GIWA bridge drained of 766 ETH; DYORSWAP reimburses users
A fake GIWA Layer 2 bridge was drained of 766 ETH after DYORSWAP mistook the network for the Upbit-backed project, according to The Defiant. Cointelegraph reports scammers stole $2M in ETH and that DYORSWAP paid over 200 ETH in compensation while Dunamu's GIWA warned its mainnet had not launched.
Why “Unverified”
- 2 independent sources (Cointelegraph, The Defiant), but no primary confirmation
2 independent source groups across 2 posts · evidence score 75/100. How labels work
Market around the story
| Asset | Price at first report | 6h before | 1h before | 1h after | 6h after | 1h move vs normal | 24h volume vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH | $2,651 | −0.05% | +0.27% | −0.41% | +0.56% | 0.8σ | 1.1× |
Returns are measured from the moment the story first appeared. “vs normal” compares the move with the asset's typical hourly move over the previous 30 days.
What the sources claim
-
A fake GIWA Layer 2 bridge was drained of 766 ETH. ETH
“Fake GIWA Layer 2 Bridge Drained of 766 ETH”
The Defiant -
DYORSWAP promises 40% reimbursement for eligible wallets that bridged less than 5 ETH. ETH
“promises 40% reimbursement for eligible wallets that bridged less than 5 ETH”
The Defiant -
Scammers stole $2M in ETH as a fake GIWA network fooled DYORSWAP. ETH
“Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP”
Cointelegraph -
DYORSWAP said it paid more than 200 ETH in compensation. ETH
“DYORSWAP said it paid more than 200 ETH in compensation”
Cointelegraph -
Upbit operator Dunamu's GIWA warned that its mainnet had not launched.
“Upbit operator Dunamu’s GIWA warned that its mainnet had not launched”
Cointelegraph
Sources
Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-09-29 17:56 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.