Live · updated 9 minutes ago · 53 stories in 24h

← Stream
Hacks & Security Unverified

Fake GIWA bridge drained of 766 ETH; DYORSWAP reimburses users

A fake GIWA Layer 2 bridge was drained of 766 ETH after DYORSWAP mistook the network for the Upbit-backed project, according to The Defiant. Cointelegraph reports scammers stole $2M in ETH and that DYORSWAP paid over 200 ETH in compensation while Dunamu's GIWA warned its mainnet had not launched.

Why “Unverified”

  • 2 independent sources (Cointelegraph, The Defiant), but no primary confirmation

2 independent source groups across 2 posts · evidence score 75/100. How labels work

Market around the story

AssetPrice at first report6h before1h before1h after6h after1h move vs normal24h volume vs median
ETH $2,651 −0.05% +0.27% −0.41% +0.56% 0.8σ 1.1×

Returns are measured from the moment the story first appeared. “vs normal” compares the move with the asset's typical hourly move over the previous 30 days.

What the sources claim

  1. A fake GIWA Layer 2 bridge was drained of 766 ETH. ETH

    “Fake GIWA Layer 2 Bridge Drained of 766 ETH”
    The Defiant
  2. DYORSWAP promises 40% reimbursement for eligible wallets that bridged less than 5 ETH. ETH

    “promises 40% reimbursement for eligible wallets that bridged less than 5 ETH”
    The Defiant
  3. Scammers stole $2M in ETH as a fake GIWA network fooled DYORSWAP. ETH

    “Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP”
    Cointelegraph
  4. DYORSWAP said it paid more than 200 ETH in compensation. ETH

    “DYORSWAP said it paid more than 200 ETH in compensation”
    Cointelegraph
  5. Upbit operator Dunamu's GIWA warned that its mainnet had not launched.

    “Upbit operator Dunamu’s GIWA warned that its mainnet had not launched”
    Cointelegraph

Sources

Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-09-29 17:56 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.