BTC 
ETH 
BNB 
XRP 
SOL 
TRX LearnBitcoin.com seeks submissions for list of wrong Bitcoin labels
LearnBitcoin.com says it will publish a list of labels applied to Bitcoin that turned out wrong, with dated sources, and asks readers what it missed. It cites the 99bitcoins obituaries list running since 2010 at 477 entries.
Why “Rumor”
- Only community or trader posts: r/Bitcoin
0 independent source groups across 1 posts · evidence score 9/100. How labels work
Market around the story
| Asset | Price at first report | 6h before | 1h before | 1h after | 6h after | 1h move vs normal | 24h volume vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | Measured six hours after the first report. | ||||||
Returns are measured from the moment the story first appeared. “vs normal” compares the move with the asset's typical hourly move over the previous 30 days.
What the sources claim
-
LearnBitcoin.com says it is publishing a list of labels confidently applied to Bitcoin, each with a dated source, and asks what it missed. BTC
“Next week we're publishing the list of everything Bitcoin has been "called" that turned out wrong”
r/Bitcoin -
The post says the 99bitcoins obituaries list has been running since 2010 and stands at 477. BTC
“The obituaries list at 99bitcoins has been running since 2010 and stands at 477.”
r/Bitcoin -
The post argues Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme because it has no operator, promises nothing, and keeps its books in public. BTC
“Bitcoin has no operator, promises nothing, and keeps its books in public.”
r/Bitcoin
Sources
Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-09-29 20:20 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.