CertiK reports suspicious 79thVault movement of 2.01M 79AU
CertiK Alert reports suspicious movement from @79thVault, with 2.01M 79AU sold via a privileged function and 16.2k BNB moved to an attacker. CertiK states ~90% is held at a specific address and a 10% bounty was offered.
Why “Unverified”
- Reported by CertiK Alert alone, with no second source or primary confirmation yet
1 independent source group across 1 post · evidence score 68/100. How labels work
Market around the story
| Asset | Price at first report | 6h before | 1h before | 1h after | 6h after | 1h move vs normal | 24h volume vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNB | $768.50 | −0.45% | 0% | −0.24% | −1.6% | 0.6σ | 0.8× |
Returns are measured from the moment the story first appeared. “vs normal” compares the move with the asset's typical hourly move over the previous 30 days.
What the sources claim
-
CertiK observed suspicious movement from @79thVault.
“We have seen suspicious movement from @79thVault”
CertiK Alert -
2.01M 79AU were sold via a privileged function.
“2.01M 79AU were sold via a privileged function”
CertiK Alert -
16.2k BNB (~$12.5M) was moved to an attacker. BNB
“moving 16.2k BNB (~$12.5M) to attacker”
CertiK Alert -
About 90% is held at a specific address.
“~90% held at: https://bscscan.com/address/0xa9537B40b02Af7Af8f1543aea3691992B2174F89”
CertiK Alert -
A 10% bounty was offered.
“to which a 10% bounty was offered”
CertiK Alert
Sources
- 🚨 #CertiKInsights → bscscan.com
More in Hacks & Security
Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-10-09 00:00 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.