Bitget Reopens Bitcoin Withdrawals After $387.5 Million Breach
Bitget reopened Bitcoin withdrawals after a breach of roughly $387.5 million, according to The Defiant and Cointelegraph. Both posts report that ETH and USDT withdrawals remain paused or scheduled to resume later.
Why “Unverified”
- 2 independent sources (Cointelegraph, The Defiant), but no primary confirmation
2 independent source groups across 2 posts · evidence score 75/100. How labels work
Market around the story
| Asset | Price at first report | 6h before | 1h before | 1h after | 6h after | 1h move vs normal | 24h volume vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | $82,972 | −0.61% | +0.41% | +0.10% | +0.85% | 0.3σ | 1.3× |
| ETH | $2,657 | −0.05% | +0.64% | +0.41% | +1.1% | 0.8σ | 1.2× |
Returns are measured from the moment the story first appeared. “vs normal” compares the move with the asset's typical hourly move over the previous 30 days.
What the sources claim
-
Bitget reopened Bitcoin withdrawals after a $387.5 million breach. BTC
“Bitget Reopens Bitcoin Withdrawals After $387.5 Million Breach”
The Defiant -
ETH and USDT withdrawals remain paused at Bitget. ETH
“ETH and USDT withdrawals remain paused”
The Defiant -
Bitget CEO Gracy Chen pledged to replenish the protection fund above $300 million this week.
“CEO Gracy Chen pledges to replenish the protection fund above $300 million this week”
The Defiant -
Bitget resumed Bitcoin withdrawals as a hacker swapped ETH via THORChain. BTC
“Bitget resumes Bitcoin withdrawals as hacker swaps ETH via THORChain”
Cointelegraph -
Ether withdrawals are scheduled to return Tuesday and USDt on Wednesday. ETH
“Ether withdrawals are scheduled to return Tuesday and USDt on Wednesday”
Cointelegraph -
Bitget is restoring services following last week's $388 million hack.
“Bitget restores services following last week’s $388 million hack”
Cointelegraph
Sources
Summary and claims extracted by deepseek/deepseek-flash with prompt analyze-story@3 on 2026-09-29 17:56 UTC. Labels are computed from the sources, not by the model.